When I was a kid, aside from sleep and school time, I spent the rest of 24/7 outside wandering the city and outskirts.
Everyday my parents either came searching for me, or if they couldn't find me, they waited for me at home to spank me.
Soon they realized that no amount of spanking is going to prevent this feral kitten from his wandering hobby.
They stopped worrying because they came to believe I could look after myself after they found out about the places I had visited (underground waste water tunnels, addict filled ruins, etc).
I wouldn't be the person I am today if I spent that time in home reading/writing on social networks.
I'm very sorry for today's kids.
But the reason today's parents don't allow their kids to go out is somehow justified.
During my childhood, many families had at least 5 kids, and they didn't care much if they lost 1 or 2 in the process of growing real men and women.
But today, parents can't risk losing their only 1 or 2 kids, so they lock them up, and prefer to grow adult children.
======================
I won't have any kids until I'm able to have at least 5 kids.
Yes, either +5 or none at all.
And I will let to grow free, and only direct and advise them. I will not enforce anything.
At last, I will let the most desirable one of them to inherit 90% of my wealth.
The best breed will take the biggest piece of cake.
I don't like lazy and/or dumb children, especially grandchildren.
IMO, equal wealth inheritance is wrong, and divides the capital built by parents into little pieces of nothingness.
Imagine a pharmaceutical company, if the owner give it to all of his/her 5 offsprings, the company will be divided and disbanded.